Arbitration Agreement for Employment Contract – Tips for HR Managers

 

Arbitration agreements can be valuable tools for resolving employment disputes. However, for HR managers, thorough knowledge of their advantages and potential pitfalls is crucial to ensure fairness, compliance, and a healthy employer-employee relationship. Here are some proactive measures HR Managers can implement to address vulnerability and foster genuine consent in arbitration agreements as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and the guidelines of UNCITRAL model:

What is arbitration?

Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process in which a neutral third party (the arbitrator) hears evidence and makes a binding decision on a dispute. It is often used in employment law cases because it is typically faster and less expensive than going to court.

How does arbitration work?

• The arbitration agreement: The first step in the arbitration process is for the employer and employee to agree to arbitrate any disputes that may arise during their employment relationship. This agreement is usually made in writing, such as in an employment contract or handbook.
• The selection of the arbitrator: The employer and employee will then need to select an arbitrator. This can be done by agreement or by using a neutral arbitration service.
• The arbitration hearing: The arbitration hearing is similar to a court trial, but it is less formal and there are fewer rules of evidence. The arbitrator will hear evidence from both the employer and the employee, and then issue a decision.

What are the benefits of arbitration for employers?

• Speed: Arbitration is typically much faster than going to court. This is because there are fewer procedural requirements, and the arbitrator does not have a heavy docket of cases.
• Cost: Arbitration is also typically less expensive than going to court. This is because there are no court fees, and the arbitrator’s fees are usually lower than attorney fees.
• Confidentiality: Arbitration proceedings are confidential, which means that the details of the dispute will not be made public. This can be beneficial for employers who want to avoid negative publicity.
• Finality: Arbitration awards are final and binding, which means that there is no right to appeal to a higher court except a few conditions as prescribed under section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. This can provide employers with certainty and closure.

What are the drawbacks of arbitration for employees?

• Limited discovery: In arbitration, there is typically less discovery than in court. This means that employees may have difficulty obtaining evidence to support their case.
• Limited rights to appeal: Arbitration awards are final and binding, which means that employees have no right to appeal to a higher court. This can be disadvantageous for employees who believe that the arbitrator has made a mistake.
• Power imbalance: Employers often have more power than employees in the arbitration process. This is because employers are typically the ones who choose the arbitrator and who pay for the arbitration costs.

Things to Consider for HR Heads

• Whether arbitration is right for your company: Arbitration may not be right for all companies. For example, it may not be a good option for companies that are frequently involved in litigation or that have a lot of employees who are represented by unions.
• What to include in the arbitration agreement: The arbitration agreement should clearly state what types of disputes are subject to arbitration, how the arbitrator will be selected, and the rules of the arbitration process.
• Training your HR staff: HR staff should be trained on the arbitration process so that they can answer employee questions and explain the benefits and drawbacks of arbitration.

Getting into the action: Drafting Arbitration Agreements

In the dynamic landscape of India’s workforce, navigating dispute resolution mechanisms for non-ID Act employees can be a complex juggling act. Arbitration, often touted for its speed and confidentiality, emerges as a tempting alternative to the traditional court system. However, for employers seeking to incorporate an arbitration clause into their employment contracts, a nuanced understanding of legal intricacies and employee protection is crucial. This article delves deeper into the key considerations and tips for HR heads when crafting an arbitration agreement for non-ID Act employees in India, aiming to illuminate the path towards a balanced and enforceable clause.

Understanding the Arbitrability Landscape:

Before embarking on the drafting journey, it’s vital to acknowledge the limitations of arbitration in the Indian context. Not all employment disputes are ripe for resolution through this mechanism. Disputes concerning wages, unfair dismissal, and those covered under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act), fall outside the realm of arbitrability. Therefore, the first step for HR heads is to meticulously assess the scope of potential disputes and ensure the arbitration clause clearly excludes non-arbitrable matters.

Navigating the Nuances of the Supreme Court Test:

The Supreme Court of India, recognizing the potential for imbalance in mandatory arbitration clauses, has laid down a four-fold test to determine their enforceability. HR heads must ensure that their clause passes this litmus test:

1. Public Policy: Does the dispute resolution through arbitration violate fundamental public policy values enshrined in the Indian Constitution or established through judicial precedents? For example, an arbitration clause cannot override an employee’s right to access justice in matters of discrimination or harassment.
2. Sovereign Functions of the State: Does the dispute involve core functions of the Indian state, such as enforcement of criminal law or taxation? Such matters remain firmly within the purview of the judicial system.
3. Res Judicata (Matters Already Pending before a Court): Is there an ongoing court proceeding related to the disputed matter? Existing litigation takes precedence over arbitration.
4. Claims Arising Out of Criminal Offences: Arbitration cannot be invoked for disputes stemming from criminal acts.

Drafting with Clarity and Fairness:

Once the arbitrability landscape is mapped, it’s time to translate clarity and fairness into the very fabric of the clause. Here are some key points to consider:

• Specificity: Define the scope of disputes covered by the arbitration clause with utmost precision. Ambiguity is an enemy, paving the way for future challenges and contention.
• Choice of Arbitrator: Establish a transparent and fair process for appointing the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal. Options can include mutual agreement between the parties, referral to institutions like the International Court of Arbitration, or a pre-determined list of potential arbitrators.
• Seat of Arbitration: Choose a neutral and convenient location for arbitration proceedings. Factors like ease of travel, availability of legal expertise, and neutrality towards both parties should be weighed carefully.
• Cost and Fee Sharing: Outline how the costs and fees associated with arbitration will be apportioned between the employer and the employee. Avoid placing an undue financial burden on the employee, potentially hindering their access to fair resolution

• Addressing the Power Imbalance: Protecting Vulnerable Employees in Arbitration Agreements

  The previous sections explored the intricacies of drafting arbitration agreements for non-ID Act employees in India, emphasizing clarity, fairness, and compliance. However, a critical layer remains, addressing the inherent power imbalance between employers and employees, particularly considering the potential vulnerability of the latter in a consent-based arbitration system.

  Acknowledging the Vulnerability:

  Let’s face it, the employment landscape often presents a power imbalance. Employees, especially those in entry-level positions or facing economic pressure, may feel compelled to accept an arbitration clause regardless of their concerns. This raises the crucial question: how can we ensure that vulnerable employees are not swept into a system that potentially undermines their rights?

  Proactive Measures for Protection:

  Here are some proactive measures HR heads can implement to address vulnerability and foster genuine consent in arbitration agreements:

  • Education and Awareness: Before presenting the arbitration clause, educate employees about their rights and the implications of opting in. Explain the arbitration process, its limitations, and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms available to them.
  • Independent Legal Advice: Encourage employees to seek independent legal counsel before signing the agreement. This empowers them to understand the clause’s legal ramifications and make an informed decision based on their specific circumstances.
  • Opt-out Window: Provide a reasonable opt-out window following employment commencement. This allows employees time to seek legal advice, assess their comfort level, and make a free and informed choice about opting into arbitration.
  • Non-Retaliation Policy: Implement a robust non-retaliation policy to ensure that employees who choose not to opt-in are not subjected to any adverse consequences or discrimination. This fosters a culture of trust and protects employees from potential pressure or coercion.
  • Grievance Redressal Mechanisms: Maintain accessible and effective internal grievance redressal mechanisms alongside arbitration. This provides employees with an alternative avenue for resolving disputes without resorting to arbitration, empowering them to voice concerns without fear of repercussions.
  • Transparency and Communication: Maintain open and transparent communication regarding the arbitration clause throughout the employment relationship. Address employee concerns promptly and provide readily available resources to answer questions and clarify any doubts.

  Striving for a Balanced Approach:

  By implementing these measures, HR heads can strive toward a more balanced and equitable approach to arbitration agreements. This not only protects vulnerable employees but also fosters trust, transparency, and a culture of respect within the workplace.

  Looking Beyond Mandatory Arbitration:

  In light of ongoing debates and concerns regarding the potential for employee disadvantage, it’s important to consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. Explore options like mediation or conciliation, which offer a more collaborative and less adversarial approach to resolving workplace conflicts. Ultimately, the goal is to create a system where employees feel empowered to voice their concerns, access fair and accessible justice, and participate actively in resolving disputes without compromising their rights or well-being. By acknowledging vulnerability, implementing protective measures, and exploring alternative mechanisms, HR heads can pave the way for a more balanced and equitable dispute resolution landscape in the Indian workplace.

  Additional Support to be used:

  • Seek expert guidance: Consult with a legal professional specializing in employment law and arbitration to draft the agreement. Their expertise will ensure compliance with relevant laws and best practices.
  • Stay updated: The legal landscape surrounding arbitration is constantly evolving. Regularly review and update the arbitration clause to reflect changes in legislation and judicial pronouncements.
  • Balance and fairness: Remember, a well-drafted arbitration clause should strike a balance between the employer’s need for swift dispute resolution and the employee’s right to fair and accessible justice.

  Emerging Concerns and the Road Ahead:

  The enforceability of mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts in India is currently under intense scrutiny. Recent judgments have raised concerns about their potential for undermining employee rights and tilting the scales in favor of employers. While legislation remains unclear, these developments necessitate a cautious approach. In case you need to learn more about the arbitration contract for employment contract, you can approach info@corpotechlegal.com

Read below an interesting article on Funding Arbitration cases in India.

• Third-Party Funding: Leveling the Playing Field in the Indian Legal System